Mandala Projects > Home > Global Classroom > Syllabus > Assignment 1
 

Global Classroom: ICE Case Study Assignments

Assignment 5: The Conflict - Environment Overlap

TED Home
Sort TED Cases
Making TED Cases
TED Help
All TED Case Studies
Relevant Bibliography
The Virtual Conferences
TED Template
Web Programming Modules

Mandala Home
Trade Environment Database
Inventory of Conflict and Environment
Global Classroom
Etown
Environment, Statistics and Policy
Site Map

©James Lee

Ice Assignment #5: Conflict - Environment Overlap

This section attempts to synthesize the conflict and environment attributes into common categories built on common attributes. This includes the type of conflict and environmental risk, the level of strategic interest, and the dispute outcome.

12. Environment-Conflict Link and Dynamics

A case may be a direct conflict over an environmental issue (such as access to resource) or indirect (the decline of resources leads to conflict). Direct cases are more often associated with short-term and indirect cases with long-term issues. This makes a difference in preventative terms.

a. Direct (i.e., Resource)
b. Indirect (i.e., Scarcity)

Make a causal diagram. Think of the relations in term of direct (+) imapcts, where a rise in Variable A causes a rise in Variable B. An iverse realtions (-) is where a the rise rise in Variable A causes a decline in Varibale B. Also, consider the types of variables: there are levels (totals), rates (how fast they change), and auxillary variables (used to consider other types of impacts).

13. Level of Strategic Interest

This category represents an ordinal variable, in locating the spatial scope of interest in the case. The interests range from small to big in terms of geography and by implication, level of strategy. The attribute also indicates the level of alliance activity.

| a. Outside Earth's Atmosphere
b. Global
c. Multilateral
d. Regional
e. State
f. Sub-state

14. Outcome of Dispute

Outcomes in these types of conflict are often nebulous and a matter of perspective. This set of outcomes takes the position of the decision-maker in the environmental conflict. The position is from the standpoint of the decision-maker.

a. Victory
b. Yield
c. Stalemate
d. Compromise



home | help & faq | ted | ice | global classroom | in development | site map

This site was conceived of by Dr. James R. Lee, jlee@american.edu
American University, The School of International Service
4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20016-8071