Hungary's mental health system serves as a prime example of the difficulties facing people with mental disabilities in the newly developing democracies of Central and Eastern Europe. More than fifty years of neglect and systematic institutionalization have left thousands of Hungarians without legal rights or recourse. MDRI's report, "Human Rights and Mental Health: Hungary," documents this situation and recommends reforms that are needed to bring Hungary into compliance with international human rights standards and laws. (Copies of "Human Rights and Mental Health: Hungary" may be obtained by calling MDRI at 202-274-4185.)
For its human rights framework, the report relies primarily on the UN's "Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care," as they are the most detailed and comprehensive codification to date of the rights of people with mental disabilities.
The report reviews over twelve institutions in Hungary and is based on interviews with institution directors, psychiatrists, care-givers, people with mental disabilities, family members and human rights advocates. MDRI worked closely with Hungarian partner organizations such as the Hungarian Civil Liberties Association and the Awakenings Foundation, a model community-based service program.
Ludanyhalaszi social care home near Balassagyarmat, Hungary. Photo courtesy of MDRI |
Members of the fact-finding missions observed major capital investments aimed at improving physical conditions of institutions and hospitals. These efforts, however, do not address the core structural problems, including the improper and unnecessary detention of many people in psychiatric institutions, the life-time segregation of 7,000 people in remote "social care homes" in inhuman and degrading conditions, and the lack of community-based support systems to reintegrate people with mental disabilities back into society.
The fact-finding teams documented numerous violations of international human rights law. Patients are denied effective assistance of counsel in civil commitment proceedings and are not offered avenues for appeal or review. Patient choice, including the right to informed consent of treatment, is not recognized under Hungarian law. In certain circumstances, individuals are held in cages because often there are no trained staff to supervise difficult patients.
The most serious abuses documented in the report are found in Hungary's social care homes, where people who are viewed as being "beyond rehabilitation" are institutionalized with little or no effort towards active treatment, rehabilitation, or reintegration into the community.
Not only are people, in effect, sentenced to life in social care homes with no procedure for reviewing the decision to commit them, but many are improperly placed there to begin with. Psychiatrists acknowledge that between ten to fifty percent of the social care home population does not require institutionalization and could live in the community if they had family support.
Another disturbing practice involves the arbitrary classification of most people as "voluntary"patients in order to avoid the time-consuming civil commitment process which requires judicial review for involuntary patients. A number of psychiatrists told MDRI they considered the commitment process a "hassle" and a "formality" and much preferred to classify individuals as voluntary patients.
In addition to legal reform, the report's primary recommendation is to change Hungary's mental health system in order to provide the network of services and support necessary to reintegrate people into the community. MDRI is working with Hungarian mental health administrators, psychiatrists, policy makers and advocates to take the first steps toward this reform, and will follow up the report with a return mission to Hungary.
Although current conditions in institutions are bleak, members of the
MDRI missions were very encouraged by the cooperation they received from
almost every mental health professional they met. The Ministry of Health
and Social Welfare has set up a special committee to draft new legislation
regulating health care and protecting patients' rights. These positive
attitudes and actions offer a promising environment for reform.
© Copyright 1996 The Human Rights Brief
Next Article
Previous Article
Return to this issue's Table of Contents
Return to The Human Rights Brief Home Page