Although the trials of war criminals from the war in the Balkans are now getting underway, the most crucial defendants remain at large. The new leaders of the former Yugoslavia refuse to comply with their responsibility under the Dayton Agreements and the perpetrators of the most inhuman acts of the war spurn the authority of the Tribunals.
There is disagreement among legal authorities over how best to counter the open defiance of indicted war criminals Ratko Mladic, Radovan Karadic and Dario Kordic. Trials in absentia would demonstrate that the international community will no longer tolerate defiance of the law. Convictions would also greatly strengthen the pressure on leaders of former Yugoslav countries to turn over their criminals. On the other hand, arresting the indicted defendants, it is argued, would effectively end the public influence of these men.
Herman Schwartz, a leading advocate of civil liberties and prisoners' rights in the United States, is a Professor of Law at WCL and Co-Director of the Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. This article is a revised and expanded version of an article he wrote in August for The Washington Post with Lloyd N. Cutler, former Counsel to Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.
Diane Orentlicher is also a Professor of Law at WCL and is Director of the War Crimes Research Office which assists the prosecution staff of the UN tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda in the Hague. Her article combines parts of an article she wrote for The Washington Post in response to that of Professor Schwartz and Lloyd Cutler, with another article previously published in The L.A. Times.
© Copyright 1996 The Human Rights Brief
Next Article
Previous Article
Return to this issue's Table of Contents
Return to The Human Rights Brief Home Page