Japan Shrimp Imports</HEAD>

Japan and Shrimp (JPSHRIMP Case)

About TED Categories and Clusters

     CASE NUMBER:   284
     CASE MNEMONIC: JPSHRIMP
     CASE NAME:     Japan and Shrimp

A.  IDENTIFICATION

1.   The Issue
     In July of 1980, Indonesian president Suharto announced a ban
on  trawling around Java Island.  The purpose of this ban was to
reduce the waste of non-target species by shrimp trawlers.  This
problem has existed within the geographic region for many years. 
Indonesian fisherman threw a great deal of non-target species back
into the oceans, often dead or dying.  Collectively, this bycatch
affects fishery depletion around the Indonesian sea region. 
Recognizing this problem, Indonesia incorporated a ban regarding
bycatch waste on 1 October 1980 and Sumatra followed on 1 January
1981.  Since 1983, trawling has been banned in the entire sea
surrounding the Indonesian region.  Japan is major importer of
Indonesian shrimp.   Many shrimping companies were effected; which
included eleven joint-stock companies between Indonesia and Japan. 
In light of this, these companies  petitioned the government to
relax the restrictions.  As a result, they  were permitted to trawl
only in the west of New Guinea Island (Irian Jaya).

2.   Description

     Fishery depletion is one of the important environmental
problem today.   The primary cause of fishery depletion is
overfishing.  Wasteful fishing  practices have damaged ocean food
resources significantly.  The haul of  unidentified fish, mostly
bycatch reached 10.2 million tons in 1992.   Another 15 to 20
million tons of bycatch -- one-fifth to one-quater of the  1993
marine catch -- is not reported at all.(1)  Shrimp trawlers have
the  highest recorded rate of bycatch because their nets have a
very small mesh  size to capture the tiny shrimp.  Shrimp bycatch
is estimated at 4.5 to 19  million tons per year with 1/4 to 1/2
discarded.(2)

     In Indonesia, shrimp trawlers discarded food and shell fish
which  other fishermen wanted to catch such as pearl oysters, sea
cucumbers, and  so on.  These fish are important income sources for
small village  fishermen.  There are some conflicts between shrimp
trawlers and small  scale fishers because they fish in the same
place.  To protect fish  depletion and waste by shrimpers, small
scale fishermen set fire to the  trawlboats.  To prevent waste and
conflict among these groups, the  Indonesian government placed a
trawling ban.

     Japan is the number one shrimp importer in the world.  In
1982, 17  percent ($ 221.873 million) of the shrimp imported was
from Indonesia (see  Table 2).  Also there were eleven joint-stock
fishery companies between  Indonesia and Japan (see Table 1).  They
were mainly shrimp trawling.   Those companies petitioned the
government to relax the restrictions.   As a result, Indonesian
government allowed them to trawling in the west of New Guinea
Island (Irian Jaya) on condition that trawlers use turtle  excluder
devices, turtle excluder devices or TEDs (see TEDS and SHRIMP
Case).


Table 1  Joint-stock fishery companies in Indonesia (1981)

        Company Name                    Export to Japan (ton)

     Misafa Mitra                            1,548
     West Irian Fishing Industry             1,325
     Central Java Marine Products            1,283
     Mina Kartika                            890
     Irian Marine Product Development        802
     Toyo Fishing Industry                   779
     Dwi Bina Utama                          643
     Alfa Kurnia Fish Enterprise             606
     Mitra Kartika Sejati Bonecom            583
     Nusantara Fishery                       390
     Minaraya Aceh Fishing Industry          NA

Source: Direktorat Bina Produksi, Direktorat Jenderal Perikanan,
Laporan             Ekspor Produk perikanan
Indonesia,1981


Table 2  Shrimp Imports of Japan

             Value ($ 1,000)     Production (tons) 

          1981      1982      1983      1981      1982      1983

Total     1,276,534 1,371,454 1,348,927 167,541   158,096   156,419
India       245,534   279,105   255,546  40,368    40,273    37,298
Indonesia   200,678   221,873   215,069  24,311    23,753    22,224
Australia   143,242   149,305   143,018  13,309    13,233    12,927
Taiwan       49,673    56,784    94,781   7,838     7,797    11,100
Thailand     75,075    85,722    71,784  10,321     9,191     7,543
China       137,318    81,415    60,810  14,956     7,260     5,779
Mexico       32,932    50,119    44,767   3,173     3,919     3,165
Philippines  24,820    37,789    44,360   2,706     3,727     4,327
Malaysia     19,460    21,382    30,666   2,674     2,661     3,727
Bangladesh   22,899    30,250    30,354   2,820     3,354     3,726

Source:  Japanese customs statistics.

     Thanks to TEDs, large creatures can usually escape capture.  
But small fish and shellfish are still vulnerable to trawler's
nets, and are  tossed back into the sea dead or dying.  Although a
penalty for trawling is  in effect, enforcement is lax. 
Additionally, there are many fishers still  trawling in banned
zones.  In case a trawler said: "Sometimes military  officers on
patrol come.  I don't worry.  All I have to do is to give them 
some cash or shrimp."(3)

     Trawling is being substituted for shrimp farming in many
cases.  In 1974, the production of shrimp farming was  10,409 ton. 
In 1984, the production was 32,000 tons, constituting about  three
times the yield ten years ago.  However, this change causes new 
environmental problem like degradation of mangrove forests.

     One of the major reasons people cut down mangrove forests  is
to make artificial shrimp ponds.(4)  Eighty to ninety percent of
the  commercial seafood species that inhabit tropical oceans spend
some part of  their lives in the mangroves, coastal areas once rich
with fish and crabs  were rendered lifeless as a result of the fish
farming industry (see  MANGROVE case).  In Indonesia, the destruction of coastal habitat has 
eliminated approximately 60 to 80 percent of the commercially
valuable  coastal species.  To combat this problem, the Indonesian
government  restricted mangrove wetland development on south Java
coast.  In the light  of this restriction, Indonesia could
potentially lose $5.6 million in  annual income for 2,400 fishermen
with the region.(5)

3.   Related Cases
SHRIMP case
TEDS case     
MANGROVE case    
TUNA case     
TUNA2 case      
SALMON case      
JWHALE case      
MEKONG case

     Key Words
     (1): Domain = ASIA
     (2): Bio geography = OCEAN
     (3): Environmental Problem = Species Loss Sea [SPLS]

4.   Draft Author: Shugo Tanaka (May, 1996)

B.   LEGAL Cluster

5.   Discourse and Status: DISagreement and COMPlete
     In July of 1980, trawling around Java Island was prohibited by 
Presidential Order number 39.  This ban takes effect 1 October
1980.  It  was expanded to include Sumatra sea coast on 1 January
1981.  In 1983, trawling was banned for the entire sea surrounding
Indonesia.  Eleven  joint-stock companies petitioned the government
to relax these restrictions  based upon extensive corporate impact. 
A compromise was established, and  these companies were permitted
to trawl only in the west of New Guinea  Island.

6.   Forum and Scope: Indonesia and UNILATeral

     The ban on trawling takes effect in domestic territory in
Indonesia.

7.   Decision Breadth: 2 (Indonesia, Japan)

8.   Legal Standing: LAW

C.   GEOGRAPHIC Filters

9.   Geographic Locations
     a.    Geographic Domain : ASIA
     b.    Geographic Site : Southeast Asia
     c.    Geographic Impact : Japan

10.  Sub-National Factors: NO

11.  Type of Habitat: OCEAN

D.   TRADE Filters

12.  Type of Measure: Regulatory ban [REGAN]

13.  Direct vs. Indirect Impacts: INDirect

14.  Relation of Measure to Environmental Impact
     a.    Directly Related  : YES SHRIMP
     b.    Indirectly        : YES FISH
     c.    Not Related       : NO
     d.    Process Related   : YES Species Loss Sea [SPLS]

15.  Trade Product Identification: SHRIMP

16.  Economic Data

     Employment: HIGH

     In 1984, about 1.1 million people worked for fishery in
Indonesia  (0.75 million in Philippines, 0.35 in Thailand, 0.1 in
Malaysia).(6)

17.  Degree of Competitive Impact: HIGH

18.  Industry Sector: FOOD

19.  Exporter and Importer: Indonesia and Japan


    Table 3   Shrimp Import Countries or Regions

                         Unit: 1000 tons     Million $

Country                  Quantity (%)        Value (%)

Japan                    183 (32.9)          1,330 (41.8)
USA                      141 (25.3)          1,040 (32.7)
Denmark                  39 ( 7.0)           90 ( 2.8)
Hong Kong                28 ( 5.0)           131 ( 4.1)
France                   27 ( 4.8)           111 ( 3.5)
UK                       19 ( 3.4)           76 ( 2.4)
Singapore                17 ( 3.1)           38 ( 1.2)
Italy                    16 ( 2.9)           72 ( 2.3)
Malaysia                 14 ( 2.5)           7 ( 0.2)
Norway                   14 ( 2.5)           14 ( 0.4)

Other developed          59 (10.6)           254 ( 8.0)
Total developed          498 (89.4)          2,987 (93.8) 

Total                    557 (100.0)         3,183 (100.0)

   Source: FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics 1985.



    Table 4   Shrimp Export Countries or Regions

                        Unit: 1000 tons Million $

Country                  Quantity (%)   Value (%) 

India                    49 (9.8)  256 (9.3)
Denmark                  35 (7.0)  94 (3.4)
Mexico                   30 ( 6.0) 327 (11.9)
Indonesia                30 ( 6.0) 196 ( 7.1)
Greenland                27 ( 5.4) 73 ( 2.6)
Thailand                 24 ( 4.8) 127 ( 4.6)
China                    22 ( 4.4) 149 ( 5.4)
Ecuador                  20 ( 4.0) 161 ( 5.8)
Hong Kong                19 ( 3.8) 133 ( 4.8)
Brazil                   16 ( 3.2) 98 ( 3.6)

Other developing         96 (19.3) 611 (22.2)
Total developing         368 (73.3)     2,225 (80.8)

Total                    499 (100.0)    32,755 (100.0)

   Source: FAO Yearbook of Fishery Statistics 1985.

E.   ENVIRONMENT Clusters

20.  Environmental Problem Type: Species Loss Sea [SPLS]

21.  Species Information
     Name of Species : Fish and Shellfish
     Type            : ANIMAL
     Diversity       : Many
     IUCN Status     : NA

22.  Impact and Effect: HIGH and PROD

23.  Urgency and Lifetime: MEDIUM and 1-2 years

24.  Substitutes: LIKE

     Bycatch fish can be reduced or boiled into fish-paste called 
'kamaboko' or 'surimi'.  This paste can be substituted for shrimp
(see SHRIMP case); alleviating some overfishing waste within the
Indonesian  region.
     Fresh water fish farmers have developed farming systems that
integrate fish  ponds with crop production; so that waste from the
ponds fertilizes  crops instead of causing pollution.  In Vietnam's
Mekong Delta, freshwater  shrimp aquaculture has flourished in
integrated systems on farms.  It is interesting to note that
farmers have been able to combine vegetable and rice crops with
shrimp in freshwater aqua-farming.(7)

F.  OTHER Factors

25.  Culture: YES

     Although the primary reason for this ban was to protect ocean
species, the  other reason was to shut the door on Chinese-
Indonesian domination of the fishing industry.(8)  In fact, there
has been a conflict between majority Malay-Indonesian and minority
Chinese-Indonesian commercial fishing companies.  The minority
Chinese-Indonesians are quite successful within this conflict
because they control vast wealth within the region.   These same
companies account for most of the shrimp trawling surrounding 
Indonesia.

26.  Human Rights: NO

27.  Trans-Border: NO

28.  Relevant Literature

"Conservation hits pits." Japan Economic Journal, 21 Jul.
1990.

Elder, Danny., and John Pernetta. The OCEANS. New York:
Random House, 1991.

Hamilton, Joan. "All You Can Stomach?" Sierra, Nov/Dec.
1994. pp. 36-38.

"Japan - Live Shellfish." 1992 National Trade Data Bank Market
Reports, 11 Mar. 1992.

"News Briefs." World Environment Report 21, 4 Jan. 1990. p.
25.

Nickerson, Colin. "Third World overfishing feeds crisis for
oceans." The Boston Globe, 11 Dec. 1994.

Son, Johanna. "Fishing Southeast Asia: Ocean of Woes Plague
Region's." Inter Press Service, 28 Mar. 1995.

Weber, Peter. "Net Loss: Fish, Jobs, and the Marine Environment."
World Watch Paper, 120 (July, 1994).

Wacker, Ronnie. "Strip mining the seas." Sea Frontiers, 40
(May, 1994), p. 14.

Murai, Yoshitaka. Ebi to Nihonjin - Shrimp and Japanese.
Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shinsho. 1988.

                           References

(1)  Peter Weber, "Net Loss: Fish, Jobs, and the Marine
Environment," World Watch Paper, 120, Jul. 1994, pp. 19-20. 
According to Peter Weber's study, estimates vary widely because
bycatch is undocumented.

(2)  Shrimp bycatch estimated at 4.5 to 19 million tons per year
with 1/4 to 1/2 discarded in Eugene C. Bricklemyer, Jr., Suzanne
Iudicello, and Hans J. Hartmann, "Discarded Cathc in U.S.
Commercial Marine Fisheries" in Willian J. Chandler, Audubon
Wildlife Report 1989/1990 (New York: Academic Press, Inc.,
1989).

(3)  Yoshitaka Murai, Ebi to Nihonjin - Shrimp and Japanese
(Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shinsho, 1988) p. 33.

(4)  Peter Weber, "Net Loss: Fish, Jobs, and the Marine
Environment," World Watch Paper, 120, Jul. 1994, p. 44.

(5)  In Indonesia, estimates of 480 kilograms per hectare per year
of lost catch from mangroves from Nora Berwick, Background Paper
On Indonesia's Coastal Resources Sector, Bureau for Science and 
Technology, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, 
D.C., April 1989.

(6)  Yoneo Ishii, Kouichi Takaya, Narihumi Maeda, Kenji Tsuchiya,
Yukiura Ikehata, Tohnan Asia wo Shiru Jiten - Southeast Asia
Encyclopedia (Tokyo, Japan: Heibonsha, 1986) p47. 

(7)  Peter Weber, "Net Loss: Fish, Jobs, and the Marine
Environment," World Watch Paper, 120, Jul. 1994, pp. 44-45.

(8)  Yoshitaka Murai, Ebi to Nihonjin - Shrimp and Japanese
(Tokyo, Japan: Iwanami Shinsho, 1988) p. 29.





Go to Asia Cases

Goto Super Page


April 30, 1996