spacer spacer spacer
spacer
AU Banner
AU Mark/Link to AU Homepage
spacer
current students spacer faculty spacer alumni spacer prospective students spacer parents spacer media
Academics Home
Provost's Office Home
Dean's Office Home


 

Dean of Academic Affairs
printer friendly
PDF version

Get Acrobat Reader
 
BACK to content

Faculty Regulations

18.        Retirement

 
 
Eligibility for participation in the retirement plan is limited to members of the full‑time faculty and staff who (1) are at least 26 years old, and (2) have completed one year of full-time service at the University or at another 501( c ) institution. Participation in the retirement program is optional. 
 
The University will assist individual faculty members who wish to retire. Guidelines for the University's retirement incentive policy are reviewed annually by the Committee on Faculty Benefits and forwarded to the provost for consideration and action. Once approved, the guidelines are distributed to all members of the full‑time faculty. The Committee on Faculty Benefits is empowered to recommend minor adjustments in the policy; substantive changes, however, must have the approval of the full University Senate, the provost and the president. Retirees who meet years‑in‑service requirements will also be eligible for the Benefit Extension Plan set forth in the Faculty/Staff Benefits Manual.  
 
Tenured full‑time faculty are also eligible to apply for phased retirement which is an appointment with a reduced load, with proportionally adjusted sabbatical leave and other benefits for a fixed period prior to retirement. The dean of academic affairs is the administrator of the Retirement Incentive Program and the Phased Retirement Programs. 
 
19.        Faculty Grievances 
 
a.  Scope  
 
In the event that a faculty member may have a grievance against the University or another member of the faculty, it is hoped that such differences can be resolved informally.  However, it may become necessary for a faculty member to take formal steps to attempt to resolve the grievance.  This section addresses the procedures that a faculty member should use for cases other than non-renewal, non-promotion, or denial of tenure for tenure track appointments. 
 
While baseless complaints are not to be encouraged, neither should a faculty member be prevented from pursuing a grievance if s/he so chooses. No individual will be penalized, disciplined, or prejudiced for exercising the right to make a complaint or for aiding another individual in the presentation of that complaint.  Persons obstructing this grievance process may be disciplined up to and including dismissal.
 
b.          Timeline 
 
Each step outlined below should be taken in a timely fashion, generally not to exceed three weeks, except when the University is not in fall and spring sessions.  
 
c.          Informal Resolution  
 
Ordinarily, faculty members should try to resolve grievances through discussions with the responsible administrative officer or colleague.  For example, if a faculty member has a grievance with respect to an action of the Washington College of Law the faculty member should  attempt to resolve the matter through discussions with the dean. The administrative officer may then consult with the other individuals and/or groups involved in the matter.  If the grievance cannot be resolved with the responsible administrative officer, the faculty member should then proceed upward through the chain of authority.  If the grievance remains unresolved, then the faculty member may seek assistance from the Washington College of Law’s Committee on Rank and Tenure.  If these informal means do not result in an agreement, then the faculty member may file a grievance with the Committee on Faculty Grievances.  
 

d.          Handling of Grievances by the Committee on Faculty Grievances

i.          Filing of Grievance 
 
When a faculty member has exhausted the informal resolution process as set forth above, the grievant may file a Formal Written Grievance.  The Formal Written Grievance should consist of the grievant's written statement and relief sought, all documents and decisions made during the informal resolution process, the name and telephone number of the grievant, and a preliminary list of individuals who may be relevant to the formal hearing process.  The date of receipt of the Formal Written Grievance by the Chair of the Committee on Faculty Grievances establishes the "Grievance Date."  The Committee chair should note the Grievance Date for all parties. When presented with a grievance, the Committee on Faculty Grievances may seek an informal resolution before proceeding to formal hearings.  When the Committee decides that a formal hearing is to be held, the procedure set forth below will be implemented: 

ii.         Hearing Process

 
a.                      A date for the formal hearing will be established by the chair and all persons directly concerned. The Committee will make available to persons directly concerned all materials in the Committee chair's file on the grievance. All persons directly concerned will be advised of the time and place at which the hearing is to be held.
 
b.                     Extensions of time or rescheduling may be granted by the chair for good cause provided that the extension shall be added to the Grievance Date in calculating any subsequent due dates established for this process.
 
c.                     If the grievant fails to appear at the hearing without good cause, the case will be dismissed with prejudice.  For this purpose, only circumstances beyond the grievant’s control which prevented his/her attendance at the hearing will constitute good cause.
 
d.                     If the responding party fails to appear at the hearing, the case will proceed in his/her absence.  
 
e.                      Any party to the grievance under consideration will be given an opportunity to be heard by the full Committee on Faculty Grievances. The faculty member may have with them at all times a counsel of his/her own choosing.  The Committee may invite other persons from within or without the University to give testimony relevant to the case, and either party to the grievance may request that the Committee invite such persons.
 
f.                      A complete and verbatim record of the hearing will be kept. At the conclusion of the hearing, the full record, together with any documents or other materials which have been introduced during the hearing, will be made available to the parties principally concerned. These parties may file written closing statements, based on a study of the record, with the chair of the Committee on Faculty Grievances. Copies of any closing statements received will be transmitted by the chair to the Committee and to the other principals, and the chair will accept rebuttals to the closing statements during a specified period of time.  Any Party to the grievance may file a closing statement with the chair. 
 
g.                     After an opportunity has been given to the parties concerned to review the record of the hearing, to submit closing statements, and to make rebuttals to the closing statements of others, the Committee on Faculty Grievances will deliberate in executive session and prepare its report.  
 
h.                     The Committee will deliver a copy of its Final Grievance Report to the provost and to the parties, and to no other persons. 
 
i.                      Before, during, and after any hearings by the Committee on Faculty Grievances, all persons directly or indirectly involved in the case are requested not to discuss the matter at issue or to express any opinions about it. If it appears desirable that any public statement be made about the case prior to the release of the Committee's Final Grievance Report, such a statement should be made only by the Chair and should be limited to what the Committee has authorized him/her to say. 
 
j.                      Upon receipt of the report, the provost will issue a statement to the Committee on Faculty Grievances and to the parties indicating the action which will be taken by the University, and, if the action is at variance with the Committee's recommendation, the reasons for such action.  
 
k.                     In any grievance or charge of violation of due process against the provost, s/he will recuse himself/herself, and the Committee on Faculty Grievances will deliver its Final Grievance Report, after formal hearings, to the president and the parties, and to no other persons.  Similarly, when the provost has been substantially involved in negotiations to resolve a grievance, s/he will recuse himself/herself if the case still requires a formal hearing, and the Committee on Faculty Grievances will deliver its report to the president and to the parties.  The president shall issue a statement to the Committee on Faculty Grievances, to the parties, and to the provost indicating the action which will be taken by the University, and, if the action is at variance with the Committee's recommendations, the reasons for such action. 
 
l.                      The final record of the Grievance, including the Formal Grievance, the transcript or recording, and documentary evidence, final or rebuttal statements of the parties, the Final Grievance Report and the provost's or president's statement will be retained by the Office of the Provost for four (4) calendar years from the Grievance Date.

BACK
 
 
 
 
spacer
4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20016 (202) 885-1000
Contact Us
spacer
spacer spacer