Photo credit: NASA / public domain
As Cuba Plans to Drill in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. Policy Poses Needless Risks to our National Interest
(Center for Democracy in the Americas, 2011)
Faced with the possibility of Cuban drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, this document considers the environmental and economic importance of easing tensions with the island nation. Without U.S. backing, Cuban drilling would threaten the viability of a healthy Gulf while also limiting American access to energy resources. The author calls for engagement with Cuba to prevent both of these possibilities.
(House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, November 2, 2011)
Vice Admiral Salerno presents a contingency plan that includes training and exercises as a fundamental tool for the U.S. to respond to oil spills. Concluding, Salerno restates the idea that “any spill…will require unity of effort across all levels of government, industry, and the private sector.”
North American Offshore Energy: Mexico and Canada Boundary Treaties and New Drilling by Cuba and Bahamas, Statement by Daniel J. Whittle
(United States House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources, November 2, 2011)
Daniel J. Whittle, Senior Attorney and Cuba Program Director Environmental Defense Fund, testifies about U.S. policies regarding Cuba that were impeding cooperation on environmental protection. The statement includes actions that the administration should take in order to negotiate with Cuba and other countries in the region.
By Elizabeth Newhouse (Center for International Policy (CIP), January 2011)
This report summarizes the findings of CIP-sponsored delegations and conferences with officials of U.S. and Cuban hurricane, civil defense and medical emergency services on hurricane preparedness, and possible areas of collaboration. The document also summarizes a series of meetings that culminated in a well-attended November 2009 conference in New Orleans to review lessons learned. Both U.S. and Cuban participants found the exchanges informative and worthwhile and expressed interest in continuing to share ideas and best practices.
Jorge R. Piñon and Robert L. Muse (Brookings Institution, May 2010)
After the major Deepwater Horizon oil spill, it became evident that environmental protection standards are vastly different between the United States and Cuba. This article claims that as Cuba becomes more open to oil and gas drilling, the U.S. must cooperate and encourage similar environmental regulations to protect shared coastal waters.
By Elizabeth Newhouse (Center for International Policy, December 2010)
This report presents the difficulties the U.S. and Cuba encounter while attempting to engage environmental issues. The document stresses that although the number of Cuban and American travelers to both countries has increased due to the Obama’s administration liberalization of policies, little has been done to further levels of collaboration.
by Benjamin Alvarado (Brookings Institution Press, 2010)
Jonathan C. Benjamin-Alvarado assesses the possibilities for cooperation between the United States and Cuba concerning energy policy. He also presents an ideal strategic energy policy and critical considerations that should be taken into consideration.
By Elizabeth Newhouse (Center for International Policy, January 2010)
This report compares levels of hurricane preparedness in Cuba and in the U.S., stating that previously, only 30 people died due to 16 hurricanes in one decade, while in the United States during Katrina alone, more than 1,500 people lost their lives.
Transcript: Steve Hamburg, introduction; Vicki Huddleston, keynote address; Scott Edwards, moderator (Brookings Institution, April 2009)
Emphasizing the importance of preserving biodiversity off the Cuban coastline, this keynote address offers environmental and economic reasons for improving communication among scientists and government agencies from the United States and Cuba. It calls for action to ensure the conservation of marine life, which is important to the ecosystems of both nations.
By Jonathan Keyser and Wayne Smith (Center for International Policy, May 2009)
This report discusses what the United States can learn from the Cuban model of successfully predicting storms and implementing disaster relief initiatives. The authors argue that the country would benefit from enacting policies that reflected Cuba’s emphasis on protecting property, providing uninterrupted social services, engaging the population in hurricane preparation and relief. They encourage further collaboration with the Cuban government on issues of mutual importance.
By Wayne Smith and Jennifer Schuett (Center for International Policy, August 2007)
Smith and Schuett argue that although the U.S. and Cuba have bantered for decades, there are issues – such as the environment – that should be of mutual concern. The authors encourage both states to engage in a bilateral understanding and dialogue through a Hurricane Convention in Mexico.
(Inter-American Dialogue, January 1997)
The Inter-American Dialogue documents their efforts to organize a workshop with Cuban and American officials and leading environmental experts in New York City in September 1994, and a meeting in Havana in June 1995. The objective of the meetings was to promote exchange on environmental issues between the United States and Cuba.
The Environmental Defense Fund works to preserve natural systems and address critical environmental problems through economically viable methods. They have built strong local relationships with Cuba to protect the wildlife in the Gulf of Mexico and foster partnerships between American and Cuban scientists.