|
Overview
Year 2001 has seen continued progress in making
protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) a priority of the
Chinese government. Strong statements by State Council leaders have
demonstrated that the government understands the widespread economic
losses of Chinese and foreign firms alike due to IPR violations.
Moreover, the State Council clearly understands that the lack of IPR
protection is a severe constraint on the development of creative
products. Investments in R&D cannot be made without a reasonable
assurance that the resulting intellectual property will be protected
long enough to earn an economic return. Software designers, authors,
filmmakers, musicians, and others cannot earn a living if their products
are immediately pirated. Additionally, the export of counterfeit and
pirated products is expected to increase as trade is stimulated by
China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), increasing the
risk of friction with trading partners and damage to China's
international reputation. The high priority given IPR protection by the
State Council has been expressed in continuing progress in promulgating
legislation, administrative regulations, and enforcement guidelines.
Notwithstanding this progress, enforcement remains
weak and ineffective in most parts of China, and many factors weigh
against successful litigation for those who attempt to protect their
intellectual property rights (IPR) via the courts. Compensation is
invariably low, while the burden of proof for the plaintiff is high.
Small-scale counterfeiters often escape with low fines that are not
easily collected and offer minimal deterrent, and the rights holder
receives minimal compensation. The court system has a shortage of
adequately trained judges, and the resources of the police, prosecutors,
and relevant administrative agencies are insufficient. It is frequently
difficult for the various bodies to cooperate smoothly, particularly in
transferring cases from civil to criminal proceedings. Finally, local
protectionism continues to favor IPR violators. Thus the problem now
facing China is to translate the improved legal framework into a
significantly changed environment at the local level. This can only be
done by improving the professional capabilities of the police,
prosecutors, courts, and administrative agencies, and strengthening
their ability to work together efficiently.
Privacy
34
Top 25 Countries by
Piracy Rate
1999 2000
Vietnam 98%
97%
China
91% 94%
Indonesia 85%
89%
……
|
China |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
Piracy Rates |
96% |
96% |
96% |
95% |
91% |
94% |
|
Revenue lost |
$443,933 |
$703,839 |
$1,449,454 |
$1,193,386 |
$645,480 |
$1,124,395 |
* Retail Software Revenue Lost to Piracy
('1000)
China is among the top 3 countries by privacy rate,
and the government is aware that establishing a legitimate system of
software copyright protection is vital for encouraging foreign firms to
offer their latest proprietary technologies in China. The government has
issued occasional circulars on the subject, including one distributed
within the ministries forbidding their use of counterfeit software. The
move demonstrates the government's resolve to address the issue at the
highest levels.
Copyright for Books & Music
35
The new copyright law clarifies the nature of
copyright protection, confirming its assignability and prescribing the
terms for a contract of copyright assignment.
The fair-use doctrine, which under the previous law
allowed for certain uses of copyrighted material without permission from
the owner, has been restricted. Radio and television stations must now
pay for the use of published music, but are not required to notify the
copyright owner in advance.
Patents
36
Prosecuting patent infringements is now easier, as
pre-litigation injunctions and requests for evidence preservation will
be accepted by the court, provided there is sufficient evidence and that
the plaintiff provides a guarantee.
The newly revised laws try to ensure that the
patent owner will receive some form of compensation by giving the judges
alternative methods of calculating compensation, such as an amount
equivalent to royalties. Where this is impracticable, sums of RMB5,000
to 300,000 (US$600 to $36,000), or in serious circumstances even
RMB500,000 (US$60,000), may be awarded. However, these sums are arguably
still too low to provide an effective deterrent.
Trademarks
37
The new law extends protection to three-dimensional
signs, geographical indications, collective trademarks, and
certification trademarks. Courts are now authorized to order an
infringing party to cease, and in some cases order property
preservation.
Counterfeiting & Enforcement
38
The State continues to deter counterfeiters with
the threat of criminal liability and imprisonment, as opposed to civil
penalties. Before a criminal prosecution can be brought, however, a
counterfeiter's illegal gains must exceed RMB50,000 (US$6,000). If the
quality of the contraband cannot be shown to be inferior, the illegal
gains must be even higher: RMB100,000 (US$12,000) if the infringing
party is an individual; RMB500,000 (US$60,000) for crimes committed by
an entity. Therefore, small-scale counterfeiters often escape with low
fines that offer minimal deterrent, and the rights holder receives
minimal compensation for the loss.
Layout Designs for Integrated Circuits
39
New regulations on the protection of layout designs
established a system for the registration of integrated circuits, to be
overseen by the State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO). A layout
design of an integrated circuit must be deemed original to receive such
protection.
Domain Name Disputes
40
Courts are showing consistently sound principles in
their treatment of domain name disputes, with frequent references to the
Paris Convention. In last year’s landmark case over the Safeguard.com.cn
domain name, the plaintiff’s trademark was found to be sufficient
grounds for defeating the defendant's registered domain name. This case
will have significant precedent value.
ICANN-based Dispute Resolution
41
For Chinese character domain names there now exists
a dispute resolution procedure based upon ICANN (Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers) procedures, and administered by the
China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Center (CIETAC). The
procedures may be used only where there is a conflict between registered
trademark rights and a domain name.
Censorship
42
China
has the most extensive Internet censorship in the world, regularly
denying local users access to 19,000 Web sites that the government deems
threatening, a study by Harvard Law School researchers finds.
Only the most determined and technologically savvy
users can evade the filtering, and they do so at some personal risk, the
study says.
Change of role for the CNNIC
43
The China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC)
has switched to an administrative role with respect to Chinese character
domain names, but retains its former role with respect to Roman-letter
names. The CNNIC retains its role under the auspices of the Ministry of
Information Industry (MII) and is an impartial, non-profit administrator
of domain names. Registration services will be devolved to other
authorized registrars, of which there are currently nine.
Registration in respect of Roman-letter domain
names has not yet been simplified. Neither is there an equivalent of the
ICANN-based international dispute resolution procedures for Roman-letter
domain names, as there are for Chinese characters.
Remittance of Royalties
44
Some companies concerned about difficulties
in arranging the remittance of royalties for licensed IPR. The
difficulties stem from notices issued by the State Administration for
Foreign Exchange that require banks to inspect specific documents
related to the recording or approval of IPR licenses and tax-paid
certification or tax-exempt certification. Unfortunately, processing the
required documentation in a timely manner is very difficult, and often
impossible.
Legislative Profile
45
Patents:
-
Patent Law, March
1984, as amended by the Decision Regarding the Revision of the Patent
Law of the People’s Republic of China, September 1992, and by the
Decision Regarding the Revision of the Patent Law of the People’s
Republic of China, August 2000.
Trade Marks:
-
Trademark Law,
August 1982, as amended by the Decision of the Revision of the
Trademark Law of the People’s Republic of China, February 1993, and by
the Decision of the Revision of the Trademark Law of the People’s
Republic of China, October 2001.
Copyright and
Related Rights
-Copyright:
-
Copyright Law of
the People’s Republic of China, September 1990, as amended by the
Decision of the Revision of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic
of China, October 2001.
-
Implementing
Regulations of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China,
May 1991.
-Other
Country-Specific Legislation or Activities
• Regulations on
Computer Software Protection, June 1991.
• Regulation on the
Protection of Layout Designs of Integrated Circuits, entered into
force October 2001.
Miscellaneous:
Digital signature
46
|
Medium
Neutrality for Signatures |
There
is no specific law concerning the legal ground of the electronic
signatures. However in the Chinese “Contract Law”, it says that
signature in electronic form is available while considering the
cases. |
|
Electronic or Digital Signature Law |
No |
|
Specific Effects for Certain Classes of Electronic Signatures |
No |
|
Certification Authorities: Voluntary Accreditation or Obligatory
Licensing |
The CA
suppliers need not only permissions of relative governmental units
administrating the establishment of usual traditional companies, but
also the permission of the State Commercial Cryptography
Administrated Office of P.R.China, to fulfill their establishment |
|
Supervision of Certification Authorities? |
The
State Commercial Cryptography Administrated Office of P.R.China. |
|
Liability of Certification Authorities? |
No |
|
Common
Criteria/Standards for products and/or certificates? |
No |
|
International Dimension? |
No |
|
|