THEORY OF CONFLICT, VIOLENCE AND WAR

33.610.01

SUMMER 2001 

MONDAY 5:30 - 8:40 PM
WEDNESDAY 5:30 - 8:40 PM



Dr Michael Salla
Office: Room 310, SIS Building 
Phone: (202) 885 1497
Email: msalla@american.edu
http://www.american.edu/salla/
 

Office Hours:
Monday 4:30 - 5:30 pm 
Wednesday 4:30 - 5:30 pm 
 

Course Description

This course analyses a range of scholarly approaches to understanding conflict, violence and war in the post-Cold War era. Distinctive themes and ideas in explanations for the sources of conflict, violence and war will be identified in order to develop effective strategies for responding to the latter. Students will be introduced to theories ranging from the individual to the civilizational, and to methodological debates concerning the appropriate level of analysis for understanding sources of conflict. The course will adopt an integrative approach that synthesize all levels of analysis but with particular emphasis on those theories which help explain the internal conflicts which form the prevalent sources of international conflict and violence in the post-cold war era. At the end of the course, students should have a firm understanding of the ways conflict, violence and war are conceptualized; and an appreciation of some of the problems confronting attempts to develop effective strategies for responding to international conflict, violence and war. 
 

Course Requirements and Evaluation
 

1. Class Participation - 20%

Your participation will be graded on the basis of three criteria: clarity; content; and context. Clarity refers to whether your comments are clear, coherent and comprehensible. Are you making yourself understood? Content refers to the substance of your remarks. Are your comments thoughtful, well-informed and to the point? Context refers to how well you integrate your comments with issues pertinent to the course or to ongoing class discussion. Do you build upon what others have said either by agreeing or disagreeing with them? Are you relating discussion to issues raised in the readings? 
 

Class discussion comes more easily for some people than for others. By temperament or habit, some are 'talkers' while others are 'listeners'. Learn to be both. An old Ghanian proverb says that 'we have two ears and one mouth, learn to use them in proportion!' If you are a 'talker', learn to give enough space for others to speak. If a 'listener', try to participate more in discussions even if this means asking questions. Intelligent questioning is just as important as thoughtful commenting!

2. Reflective Papers 30%

You are to complete five reflective papers of between 500-750 words that examines the readings offered for each level of analysis offerred in the course. Note this is approximately one report per week and one report per level of analysis with the exception of the first level analysis which requires two reading reports. Due dates cover the readings from the last submission up to and including the reading for the due date. Dates are July 9; July 16; July 23, July 30, Aug 8. The reflective papers should not be a detailed summary of the readings but should instead be a personal response in terms of how the readings have (or have not!) contributed to your own understanding of the sources of conflict, violence and war. Your paper needs to show some evidence that you have read most if not all of the set readings. In writing your reflective paper, you need to explicity consider the following questions.
 

Note that reflective papers will be graded. Papers scoring less than a B+ can be resubmitted for a maximum of B+. You need to complete all reflective papers. 

3. Group Presentations - 20%

You are required to form groups of two to give presentations incorporating the theories and perspectives you believe most appropriate for describing a recent case of international conflict, violence or war. You must attempt to interpret the relevance of your case study and the conclusions you draw for conflict, violence and war in the 21st century. Your group is expected to distribute a two page summary to the class during the presentation. Assessment will be based on the quality of your presentation and summary. 
 

4. End of Term Paper - 30%

A list of questions will be handed out to the class dealing with particular problems concerning conflict, violence and war. Each paper should critically question the literature in terms of diverging approaches and perspectives taken by scholars in addressing the question. (Note: suggestions for essay writing appear at the end of this syllabus.) Papers should be between 12-15 double spaced pages, fully referenced & including a bibliography, and handed in on August 6.

Note: You are expected to submit a two page outline of your planned paper on July 25. The outline should explicitly state your main argument in response to the question. The outline should be broken down into section headings with a brief description of what you expect each section to cover. You need to use prose to explain the framework you use rather than just provide a series of numbered headings which give me little idea of whether your essay is descriptive, analytical or indeed even answers the question. You should also include a bibliography of at least eight books/articles that you will use for the essay. Remember, the outline is intended to get you thinking in advance of the issues that you will be investigating, and of developing an argument and framework that will give your essay coherence. The more work you put into it, the easier it will be for more to identify any potential problem areas and to give you constructive suggestions. 
 

Required Texts


Note: Course Reserve Material is available on the American University Electronic Resrve System or go directly to http://eresau.wrlc.org The password is SALLA610 (the system is case sensitive).
 


CLASS SCHEDULE

July 2 Introduction: Methodological Approaches to the Study of Violence, Conflict and War in the Post-Cold War Era 

CASE STUDY: ISRAEL PALESTINE

July 4 Independence Day - No Class
 

I. First Image - Individual Sources 
 

July 9 The Psychological Bases of Violence 

Further Reading July 11 Hatred & Aggression 


Further Reading


Video: Beyond Hate: The Heart of Hatred
 

July 16 Frustration & Fear 

Further Reading
  • Walter Korpi, "Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation," American Political Science Review 68:4 (1974) 1569-1578 [online access through AU library's electronic texts section] 
  • Roger Coate & Jerel Rosati, "Human Needs in World Society," The Power of Human Needs in World Society, eds., Roger Coate & Jerel Rosati, 1-20
  • Seyom Brown, The Causes and Prevention of War, 29-47
  • Terry Boswell & William Dixon, "Marx's Theory of Rebellion," American Sociological Review 58:5 (1993): 681-702 [online access through AU library's electronic texts section]
  • Knud Larsen, Aggression: Myths and Models (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1976) 57-75

II. Second Image - Societal Sources 
 

July 18 Cultural Violence & Dehumanization of the Enemy

  • Jacob Rabbie, "Group processes as stimulants of aggression," in Aggression and War, 141-55 
  • K. Lagerspetz, "Media and the social environment," in Aggression and War, 164-73
  • Cultural factors, "biology and human aggression, in Aggression and War, 173-88
  • Robert Elias, "A Culture of Violent Solutions," in the Web of Violence, 117-48
  • Riane Eisler, "Human Rights and Violence: Integrating the Private and Public Sphere,"Web of Violence, 162-85
  • Johan Galtung, Peace by Peaceful Means, 196-210
  • Janice Gross Stein, "Image, Identity, and Conflict Resolution," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 93-112.

  •  
Video: Faces of the Enemy
 

Further Reading

  • Vamik Volkan, "An Overview of Psychological Concepts Pertinent to Interethnic and/or International Relationships," The Psychodynamics of International Relationships (Lexington Books, 1990) 31-46
  • Demetrios A. Julius, "The Genesis and Perpetuation of Aggression in International Conflicts" The Psychodynamics of International Relationships (Lexington Books, 1990) 97-110
  • Rafael Moses, "On Dehumanizing the Enemy," The Psychodynamics of International Relationships (Lexington Books, 1990) 111-18 
  • Robert Rieber and Robert Kelly, 'Substance and Shadow: Images of the Enemy,' in The Psychology of War and Peace. The Image of the Enemy, ed. Robert Rieber (New York: Plenum, 1991) 3-40
  • Arun Swamy, "Nationalist Ideologies and Misperceptions in Indo-US Relations," Foreign Policy in Focus. Special Report March 20, 2000. http://www.foreignpolicy-infocus.org/papers/india/index.html
  • •Daniel Pipes, "Is Russia Still an Enemy," Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1997): 65-78
  • Joseph Monteville, "The Psychological Roots of Ethnic and Sectarian Terrorism," The Psychodynamics of International Relationships (Lexington Books, 1990) 163-80

  •  
July 23 Ethnic Nationalism, Authoritarianism & Failed States 
  • Holsti, The State, War and the State of War, 61-122
  • Stephen Van Evera, "Hypotheses on Nationalism and War, in Theories of War and Peace, 257-91
  • David Lake & Donald Rothchild, "Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict," in Theories of War and Peace, 292-328
  • Ted Robert Gurr, "Minorities, Nationalists, and Ethnopolitical Conflict," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 53-78
  • Mark N. Katz, "Collapsed Empires," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 25-36
  • John M. Owen, "How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace," in Theories of War and Peace, 137-75
Further Reading
  • Fareed Zakaria, "The Rise of Illiberal Democracy," Foreign Affairs 76:6 (1997): 22-43
  • Michael Doyle, "Liberalism and World Politics," in The New Shape of World Politics, 
  • Christopher Layne, "Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace," in Theories of War and Peace, 176-220
  • Philip Smith, "Civil Society & Violence," The Web of Violence, eds., Turpin & Kurtz, 91-116 
  • Edward Mansfield & Jack Snyder, "Democratization and the Danger of War, in Theories of War and Peace, 221-256
  • Mohammed Ayoob, "State Breaking, and State Failure," ," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 37-51.
  • Francis Underhill, "Where Does Violence Come," American Diplomacy 3:3 (1998). http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives/arcframe.html
  • •Tarja Väyrynen, "Securitised Ethnic Identities and Communal Conflicts," Peace and Conflict Studies, 5:1 (June 1998) http://www.gmu.edu/academic/pcs/burton.htm 
  • •P. Sahadevan, "Ethnic Conflict and Militarism in South Asia," Occasional Paper #16, Kroc Institution, http://www.nd.edu/~krocinst/sahadevan.pdf
  • •Fred W. Riggs, "Turmoil Among Nations," Injustice Studies 1:1 (November 1997) http://wolf.its.ilstu.edu/injustice/
  • •Anthony Baird, "An Atmosphere of Reconciliation: A Theory of Resolving Ethnic Conflicts Based on the Transcaucasian Conflicts," Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution (August 1999), http://www.trinstitute.org/ojpcr/2_4baird.htm
  • Donald Horowitz, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (University of California Press, 1985) 3-12
  • Jurgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975) 1-31, 45-50
  • C. Ellison & J. Bartkowski, "Religion and the Legitimation of Violence," The Web of Violence, eds. Turpin & Kurtz, 46-67
  • Francis Fukuyama, "The End of History," in The New Shape of World Politics, 1-25 
  • Marc F. Plattner, "Liberalism and Democracy: Can't Have One Without the Other," Foreign Affairs 77:2 (1998) 171-80
  • Joshua Muravchik, "Promoting Peace Through Democracy," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 573-86
  • Charles A. Kupchan, et al. "Illiberal Illusions: Restoring Democracy's Good Name" Foreign Affairs, 77:3 (1998)122-28
  • Fareed Zakaria, "Culture Is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew," in The New Shape of World Politics, 219-33
  • Kim Dae Jung, "Is Culture Destiny: The Myth of Asia's Anti-Democratic Values," in The New Shape of World Politics, 234-41
  • Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay (New York, The Liberal Arts Press, 1948) 1-52
III. Third Image - International Sources

 

July 25 Term Paper Outline Due

July 25 The Westphalian State System & Weapons Proliferation

  • John Mearsheimer, "Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War," in Theories of War and Peace, 3-54
  • Charles Glaser, "Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help," in Theories of War and Peace, 94-136
  • John Gerard Ruggie, "The False Premise of Realism," in Theories of War and Peace, 407-16
  • J.David Singer, The political origins of international war: a multifactorial review, in Theories of War and Peace, 202-29
  • •Stephen Van Evera, "Offence, Defence, and the Causes of War," in Theories of War and Peace, 55-93
  • Geoffrey Kemp, "Military Technology and Conflict," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 129-40
  • Alex Roland, "Technology and War," American Diplomacy 2:2 (1997). http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives/arcframe.html 

Video: To be announced
 

Further Reading 

  • Richard Betts, The New Threat of Mass Destruction, Foreign Affairs 77:1 (1998): 26-41
  • John Steinburner, "Biological Weapons: A Plague Upon all Houses," Foreign Policy 109 (Winter 1997-98): 85-112
  • William Keller & Janne Nolan, "The Arms Trade: Business As Usual," Foreign Policy 109 (Winter 1997-98): 112-25
  • Brown, The Causes and Prevention of War, 2nd ed. (New York: St Martin's Press, 1994)82-99


July 30 International Trade 

  • Dale Copeland, "Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations," in Theories of War and Peace, 464-501
  • Paul Krugman, "Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession," in The New Shape of World Politics, 161-76
  • Edward Luttwark, "From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce," in The New Shape of World Politics, 177-86
  • Theodore H. Moran, "Trade and Investment Dimensions of International Conflict," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 155-72
  • Richard E. Bissell, "The Resource Dimension of International Conflict," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 141-55
  • Paul Krugman, "Workers and Economists I: First Do No Harm," in The New Shape of World Politics, 206-13
IV. Fourth Image - Global Sources 

 

August 1 Global Population Explosion & the Environment

  • Thomas F. Homer-Dixon, Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases, in Theories of War and Peace,501-36
  • John Orme, "The Utility of Force in a World of Scarcity," in Theories of War and Peace,
  • Astri Suhrke, "Environmental Change, Migration, and Conflict: A Lethal Feedback Dynamic?" in Managing Global Chaos, 113-28 

  •  
Video: World War III - the Population Explosion on the Planet 
 

August 6 International Conspiracy Theories, UFO's & Secret Government 

  • •Executive Summary of Disclosure Project Briefing Document, http://www.disclosureproject.org/PDF-Documents/ExecSummaryNOdocs.pdf (Note: this is in PDF File) http://www.disclosureproject.org/Word-Documents/ExecutiveSummary-NOdocs.doc (Note: This is in Word 2000 format)
  • •John Mack, Abduction: Human Encounters with Aliens, New York: Ballantine, 19941-36
  • •http://www.abductee.net/index.html (read levels 5 & 7, click left icons to go through each level) 
  • •Richard Boylan, UFO REALITY SHIFT?: Governments may soon break fifty years of silence to tell us the truth about UFOs visiting our planet. But will they tell the whole truth...? Nexus Magazine, Volume 3, #3 (April-May 1996). http://www.mt.net/~watcher/boylan2.html
  • •Milton William Cooper, The UFO Conspiracy, Speech at "Whole Life Expo", Los Angeles, November 17, 1989 http://ebe.allwebco.com/Sections/GovernmentCoverups/Archive/ufoconspiracy.shtml
  • •Robert Dean, Former NATO staffer Robert Dean speaks out on UFOs" Perceptions Magazine, May/June 2000 http://ebe.allwebco.com/Sections/GovernmentCoverups/Archive/shape.shtml
  • •Johsua David Stone, Hidden Mysteries: ET's, Ancient Mystery Schools and Ascension (Sedona, Arizona, Light Technology Publishing, 1995) 1-18
  • •Patricia Pereira, Eagles of a New Dawn, 25-29, 74-77


Further Reading

  • •Sheldan Nidle, Your First Contact (Pukalani, HI.: Blue Lodge Press, 2000) 263 -318

Video: www.connectlive.com/events/disclosureproject/
 

August 6 Term Paper Due
 

August 8 The Emergence of a New Civilizational Consciousness 

  • Pitirim Sorokin, The Basic Trends of Our Times (New Haven, CONN.: College & University Press, 1964) 13-62
  • Michael Salla, "Political Islam & the West: A New Cold War or Convergence?" Third World Quarterly 18:4 (1997): 729-742 
  • James Redfield, The Celestine Vision (New York: Warner Books, 1997) 207-34
  • Lia Shapiro, From Out of the Light a New World is Forming, http://www.spiritweb.org/Spirit/new-world-lia.html 
  • Patricia Pereira, Eagles of a New Dawn, 201-17
  • W.T. Samsel, The Atlantis Connection (Sedona, Arizona: Starfire Publishing, 1998) vii-xii, 73-88, 197-207

  •  
Further Reading
  • Samuel Huntington, "Clash of Civilizations," in The New Shape of World Politics, 67-91
  • Johan Galtung, "Is there a Therapy for Pathological Cosmologies," The Web of Violence, eds., Turpin & Kurtz, 188-205
  • Fouad Ajami, "The Summoning," in The New Shape of World Politics, 92-100
  • David Little, "Religious Militancy," Managing Global Chaos, eds., Crocker, et al., 79-92
  • Ali Mazrui, Islamic and Western Values, Foreign Affairs 76:5 (1998): 118-32
  • Jeff Haynes, "Religion, secularisation and politics: a postmodern conspectus,"Third World Quarterly 18:4 (1997): 709-28
  • C. Ellison & J. Bartkowski, "Religion and the Legitimation of Violence," The Web of Violence, eds. Turpin & Kurtz, 46-67 
  • M.E.Salla, Islamic Radicalism & the West
  • Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the remaking of world order (New York: Simon Shuster, 1996)
  • Johan Galtung, Peace by Peaceful Means, 211-24

  •  
SUGGESTIONS FOR ESSAY WRITING

 

The essence of good essay writing is to be found in the quality of your argument and the level of analysis. The essay must go beyond description and narrative. It is not enough just to tell a story, nor is it enough just to produce a large number of facts related to the topic of your essay, nor is it enough to merely recount what the authors of the textbooks have to say about the topic. The essay should represent your considered perspective and your informed thoughts on the problem you have been asked to write about. Of course, you cannot begin to construct a considered perspective or develop informed thoughts unless you first have a firm understanding of the subject matter. So the first step is reading intensively and acquiring a grasp of both the factual material and the arguments, debates, and differences between those scholars who have contributed to the literature on the subject. Having done that, you are then in a position to analyze the issue and develop your own argument.
 

An argument, in its basic sense, is a statement, supported by adequate empirical evidence or logical inference, which addresses the question and presents a point of view or a perspective on that question. The quality of the argument will be measured by how persuasive it is, and its persuasiveness will be a function of the skill with which you have constructed that argument. 
 

Once you have chosen your essay topic (or perhaps even as part of the process of choosing your topic) it is helpful for you to begin by thinking about what the question means and what you are being asked to do. Eventually this will become 'second nature' to you, but you might think about approaching the task in this way. Here is an example of how you might analyze a question in Peace and Conflict Resolution.
 

'Does the notion of 'structural violence' lead to a welcome extension to our understanding of peace or does it introduce unwelcome ambiguities?
 

First, you should identify the broad topic or subject of the question (this may seem obvious but it is a good starting point). In the example given, the broadly defined topic is - 'peace'. 

Second, you need to identify the more specific focus of the question - in this case, the focus is the relationship between 'structural violence' and 'peace'. 
 

Third, you need to think carefully about any directions you are given in the question. For example, here you are being asked whether structural violence leads 'to a welcome extension' or introduces 'unwelcome ambiguities' to our understanding of peace. Your answer might be yes to the first part of the question (in which case you would have to say why), and no to the second part (and again, you would have to say why).
 

Remember that at all times you will need to support your answer with an argument, rather than simply making assertions. The more complex your argument, provided it is clearly outlined, the more likely you will exhibit the necessary analytical sophistication and creativity necessary for a high grade.