|
|
ICE Case Studies
|
|
I.
Case Background |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
The announcement provoked immediate and widespread
repercussions. It was followed by a press conference (7 November
1986) held by the Minister of the Defense Department. The minister
described the North Korean dam as more dangerous than the atomic
bomb. The Dam enormously intensified the tension between the two
Koreas. To most South Koreans at that time, the Geumgang Mountain
Dam was viewed as a dangerous, demonic military technology.
A group of South Korean scientists and engineers confirmed the government's claim that the Geumgang Mountain Dam did in fact have the potential of causing serious damage to South Korea. They also proposed a countermeasure to offset the potential power of the North Korea's Geumgang Mountain Dam. This was to take the form of the Peace Dam in South Korea. The Peace Dam, 601 meters wide at the top and 125 meters high, has a water storage capacity of 2.63 billion tons, according to the Ministry of Construction and Transportation. It cost 400 billion Won ($380 million). The dam is located about 125 kilometers northeast of Seoul and is intended to mitigate damages in case North Korea's Geumgang Mountain dam collapsed, ministry officials said.[2] But the announcement was later dismissed as an anti-communist ploy designed to overcome Chun's political crisis, and construction on the dam came to a halt in 1990. In 1993, the Board of Audit and Inspection under President Kim Young-Sam's government found that the flood threat was "absurdly bloated." The actual North Korean reservoir also turned out to be 710 meters wide and 121.5 meters high and has a claimed capacity of 2.62 billion tons of water, less than one-eighth the Chun government's claim. The dam was completed in 2003.[4]
Possible water release from the North's dam has long been a source of security fears in the South, which faces lingering threats from its communist neighbor. Changes in weather patterns had also brought more torrential rain to the region so work was resumed on the Peace Dam in September 2002. Floods caused by the North occurred in October 2001 and in September 2002 causing hundred of thousands dollars in damages. The usefulness of the Peace Dam turned to be true finally.[2] In September 2005, North Korea released a massive amount of water from a dam just north of the border without warning, causing massive flooding in the South's border area, reminding residents of the perils of living next to the communist neighbor that invaded the South five decades ago.
|
|
|
|
North Korean Geunmgang Moutain Dam and
South Korean Peace Dam confront each other at eastern DMZ area(38
12'47.19"N 127 50'46.74"E). You can locate the Peace Dam precisely
by downloading
this file(686bytes),
if you are using
the Google Earth.[6]
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
From above two cases, either flood or water loss, we can define this
type of environmental problem as HABITAT.
|
|
Therefore, climate in the summer as well as geography are very important factor to understand environment and conflict between South and North Korea at this case study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But the level of threat is not zero as ever because lower side of the Han River, Seoul area, has been more less water resources about 1.7 billion ton per year due to construction of the Geumgangsan Dam by North Korea, so that possibilities of conflict between two Koreas is still in exist. There are two solutions about this as S. Korea; First, South Korea decided to reserve 0.1 billion water resource in the Peace Dam all the time in case of severe drought. Second, South Korean Government persuades North Korea to discharge water resource from the Geumgangsan Dam periodically. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Korea Broadcasting Corporation, 2006. "Millionth Visitor to Mt. Geumgang" KBS Global News. 08 March. Internet. Available from http://english.kbs.co.kr/news/zoom/1354003_11781.html; accessed 08 March 2006.
2. East West Service. 2005. "S. Korea completes
'Peace Dam' to block flood attack from North". World Tribune. 27
October. Internet. 3. Wikipedia. 2006. Chun Doo-hwan. Wikipedia 'The Free Encyclopedia'. 06 March. Internet. Available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chun_Doo-hwan ; accessed 08 March 2006. 4. Hoh Kui-seek. 2005. Dedication of Peace Dam comes after 19-year hiatus. The JoongAng Daily. 27 October. Internet. Available from http://joongangdaily.joins.com/200510/18/200510182140303239900090409041.html ; accessed 08 March 2006. 5. Korea.Net. 2006. General Information on Korea. The Korean Overseas Information Service (KOIS). Internet. Available from http://www.korea.net/korea/kor_loca.asp?code=A0101 ; accessed 08 March 2006.
6. All
right reserved by the Google. For more information about their
privacy practices, go to the
full privacy policy. If you have additional questions, please
contact them. Or write to them at: 7. Central Intelligence Agency. 2005. The World Fact Book. CIA. Internet. Available from http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/ ; accessed 08 March 2006. |
|
[May, 2006] |