A primary focus of the research at the Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies is the institution of the presidency. Our work focuses both on relationships between the President and Congress as well as outside interests lobbying the executive branch. Additionally, CCPS scholars have studied the presidential campaigns to see what works, what does not, and what influences voters to cast their ballots one way or the other (or at all). CCPS scholars have written numerous books and articles examining these relationships and behaviors.
How to Keep the Republic (Before It's Too Late): Why a New Constitution Is Necessary to Strengthen Liberal Democracy in the United States
Assistant Professor of Government and CCPS Fellow Chris Edelson’s current project focuses on tension between authoritarianism and constitutional democracy in the context of the U.S. presidency. Current scholarly discussion of the authoritarian threat Donald Trump’s presidency poses to constitutional democracy in the United States either underestimates the danger or fails to consider whether the current system has failed and fundamental change is needed to strengthen democracy. This working paper proposes a test to determine whether constitutional failure has occurred and evaluates possible authoritarian action Trump has taken in several areas. The paper concludes that Trump’s presidency has revealed the failure of the current system and proposes a new constitution to strengthen liberal democracy in the United States.
Newt Gingrich: A Study of Political Entrepreneurship
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) is one of the most influential political figures of the 20th century, but there is no comprehensive scholarly biography that considers Gingrich’s time in Congress and how his contributions fit into the existing political science literature. In this project, Jeffrey Crouch (with Matthew N. Green) aims to link these two literatures and fill an important gap in scholarly work on Congress. Crouch's research has been funded in part by grants from the Dirksen Congressional Center, the Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, and the Association of Centers for the Study of Congress, as well as an American University Faculty Research Support Grant.
The Unitary Executive: Myth and Presidential Power
This project considers the ”unitary executive” theory, which, to some proponents, provides the president with all of the federal government’s “executive power” and affords him complete control over his subordinates. In a book-length analysis and critique, Jeffrey Crouch (with Mark J. Rozell and Mitchel A. Sollenberger) argues that such interpretations of the “unitary executive” theory clash with traditional notions of the separation of powers. Crouch has received funding for this project from an American University Faculty Research Support Grant.
- Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen (Oxford University Press, 1st Edition, 2012)(David C. Barker and Christopher Jan Carman).
- Campaigns and Elections American Style (Boulder, CO.: Westview Press, 3rd Edition, 2009)(Eds. James A Thurber and Candice J. Nelson).
- Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 4th edition, 2009)(Ed. James A. Thurber).
- "A Perfect Campaign: The Role of Money, Organization and Strategy in the 2008 Presidential Campaign," in Erik Jones and Salvatore Vassallo (eds.), The 2008 Presidential Election: A Story in Four Acts (New York, Palgrave MacMillan, August 2009).